New Mexico policyholders who had UIM automobile insurance coverage with Hartford between 2014 and 2022.
You may be eligible for the Hartford insurance settlement if you:
Eligible States
To get paid from the Hartford Insurance settlement:
Wrongful death claimants can receive automatic payment without filing (autopay of UIM offset). Non-wrongful death claimants can elect either: (1) Premium formula – 23% of UIM premiums paid (no proof required), or (2) Claim formula – UIM claim reevaluation without offset (supporting documentation may be required upon request).
Hartford Insurance settlement payments vary depending on which payment option you choose. Class members who elect the premium formula receive 23% of all UIM premiums they paid to Hartford during the applicable class period. Those who choose the claim formula instead have their UIM claim readjusted without the offset applied, though the actual payment will depend on your individual damages and could be less than the full offset amount, or nothing, if your damages do not support additional recovery. Wrongful death claimants are eligible for automatic payment of the full offset amount without needing to submit a claim form. Payments for premium-formula claims (Option 2) will be sent no later than 60 days after the May 22, 2026 claim deadline. Payments for claim-reevaluation claims (Option 1) will be sent no later than 90 days after the claim deadline, or within 30 days of a Neutral Evaluator decision if your claim is referred for review. All payments are contingent on final court approval of the settlement.
Plaintiffs Raya Soleil, Ross Soleil, and Mary Hammonds filed suit against Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest in the New Mexico District Court for Bernalillo County (Case No. D-202-CV-2023-08611). The lawsuit alleged that Hartford sold illusory or misleading underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in New Mexico automobile insurance policies, collected premiums for that coverage, and then improperly applied offsets that reduced or eliminated UIM benefits when policyholders filed claims after accidents with underinsured drivers.
More specifically, plaintiffs alleged that Hartford failed to disclose the effect of offsetting the at-fault driver’s liability coverage against UIM benefits, a practice addressed by the New Mexico Supreme Court in Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1985). The suit claimed this amounted to a breach of the insurance contracts and violated New Mexico law.
Hartford denied all allegations, maintained it complied with policy terms and applicable law, and denied acting wrongfully or unlawfully. Without any court finding of liability, both sides agreed to settle to avoid the costs and risks of trial. For more information, visit the official settlement website.
Soleil and Hammonds v. Hartford
c/o Claims Administrator
P.O. Box 2775
Portland, OR 97208-2775
There are no similar listings
No news articles related to this settlement yet
Disclaimer
The information on this website is free to access and provided for general educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. We summarise settlement information from official notices, court documents, settlement websites, administrators, and other primary sources where available.
Settlement details and deadlines may change. Always refer to the official settlement website or consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Every listing is reviewed by our research team. Found an error? Let us know. Learn more about how we verify our information.